Judicial act: judgment of the Intellectual Property Rights Court dated October 26, 2021 in case No. А53-42822/2020.
Court's findings:
1. The fact that the right holder has granted a complex of exclusive rights to a commercial designation and a production secret (know-how) and their use in commercial activities by the recipient under the contract sufficiently testifies to the real will of the parties to conclude and execute the contract in the form stipulated by it.
2. Misrepresentation and creation by the other party of the contract of a false idea about the essence of the actions performed by it must be reliably proven. At the same time, in similar disputes, the recipient under the contract needs to prove precisely the fact that when concluding a contract with a specifically named item in the form of granting the right to a commercial designation and production secrets, his will was directed to making another transaction, in particular, to obtaining the right to use defendant's trademark.
3. An agreement that grants the right to use only a commercial designation and a production secret (know-how) and does not grant the right to use a trademark cannot be regarded as a commercial concession agreement and, accordingly, is not subject to registration with Rospatent.
Comments:
1. Any person engaged in entrepreneurial activity, when concluding civil law contracts, must evaluate all the conditions included in such contracts both from the point of view of their business risks and from the point of view of understanding the actual essence of these conditions, since in the future, in the event of disputes over the actual will of the parties, expressed in the specific wording of the contract, will be assessed by it by the court.
2. We must also not forget about the essential conditions and requirements for certain types of contracts, which are imperatively established by law. Thus, for commercial concession agreements (franchising or franchise), it is essential to grant the right to use, first of all, a trademark or service mark, which must be registered in the prescribed manner.
3. At the same time, commercial cooperation between entrepreneurs can be expressed in various forms, including through the conclusion of mixed types of contracts aimed at obtaining benefits from each of the parties from the rights acquired from such contracts.
Please note that in 2020 the law firm Vetrov & Partners was marked by the industry rating of law firms Pravo.ru-300 in the nominations Arbitration Proceedings, Dispute Resolution in Courts of General Jurisdiction and is one of the regional companies throughout Russia in these nominations.
In the event that your litigation or other dispute, contractual work or any other form of activity concerns the issues discussed in this or our other material, we recommend that you check and make sure that your legal position complies with the latest changes in practice and legislation.
We will be happy to provide you with legal assistance regarding the minimization of legal risks and available opportunities. We will try to find a solution that is right for you.
Call +7 (383) 310-38-76 or write to info@vitvet.com.
Our law firm provides various legal services in different cities of Russia (including Novosibirsk, Tomsk, Omsk, Barnaul, Krasnoyarsk, Kemerovo, Novokuznetsk, Irkutsk, Chita, Vladivostok, Moscow, St. Petersburg, Yekaterinburg, Nizhny Novgorod, Kazan, Samara, Chelyabinsk, Rostov-on-Don, Ufa, Volgograd, Perm, Voronezh, Saratov, Krasnodar, Tolyatti, Sochi).
David Glikshtein, manager. I write articles, look for interesting information and suggest ways to use it in practice. I believe that thanks to high-quality legal analytics, clients come to a law firm, and not vice versa. Do you agree? Then let's be friends on Facebook.