The fate of the burned-out Nevsky Manufactory. Violation of the owner on fire safety. Ignoring the requirements of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia. Actions, inactions of the owner. Effects.
The court and the promises of the owner: what is known about the fate of the burned-out Nevsky Manufactory, says Kommersant
This week, KGIOP filed a complaint with the Arbitration Court of St. Petersburg and the Leningrad Region against the obligation of Nevskaya Manufactory OJSC to carry out a series of emergency works within six months from the date of entry into force of the court decision at the following address: a cultural heritage site of regional significance "Building Complex of the Factory" Thornton" and carry out restoration work within 48 months. In addition, the commission asked to establish a deferment for failure to comply with the court decision within the prescribed period in the amount of 100 thousand rubles, and in case of further non-performance - 200 thousand rubles a month.
By the way, the owner himself has already promised to repair the building. One of the shareholders of the complex, Aleksey Ustaev, made an official appeal to the Governor Alexander Beglev. He noted that the concept and design of the plan had already been commissioned by the well-known architectural studio Studio 44.
According to the regional department of the Ministry of Emergency Situations, the owner ignored the requirements of the department for seven years. As Petr Smirnov, the head of the department of supervision and preventive work of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Emergency Situations for St. Petersburg, annually reported, during the installation, malfunctions were detected in the automatic fire extinguishing system, the company also lacked a control system. notification and evacuation, fire alarm and other remarks.
Judging by the files of cases, various regulatory authorities have already issued resolutions against Nevskaya Manufactory JSC in connection with violations at the facility.
Violations of the owner and the expected outcome of the case will be commented by the lawyer of the law firm Vetrov and Partners Kristina Kornoukhova.
The case is complex. I do not presume to say who is right or wrong. It is important to note that the causes of what happened are not necessarily related to the action (inaction) of the owner. Yes, by default, it bears a lot of obligations, responsibility in itself, and, by the way, the risks of losing the funds invested in the object. However, is the response of the authorities now the kind of assistance that the owner would like to receive in case of damage or destruction of the object? In my opinion, no. Therefore, sometimes it is important not to “finish off”, but simply “to lend a helping hand”.
We will be happy to provide you with legal assistance regarding the minimization of legal risks and available opportunities. We will try to find a solution that is right for you.
Call +7 (383) 310-38-76 or write to info@vitvet.com.
We recommend that you read our blog dedicated to legal and judicial cases (arbitration practice) and read the materials in the "Articles" section.
Our law firm provides various legal services in different cities of Russia (including Novosibirsk, Tomsk, Omsk, Barnaul, Krasnoyarsk, Kemerovo, Novokuznetsk, Irkutsk, Chita, Vladivostok, Moscow, St. Petersburg, Yekaterinburg, Nizhny Novgorod, Kazan, Samara, Chelyabinsk, Rostov-on-Don, Ufa, Volgograd, Perm, Voronezh, Saratov, Krasnodar, Togliatti, Sochi).
We will be glad to see you among our clients! Call or write right now!
Phone +7 (383) 310-38-76
Email info@vitvet.com
Law firm "Vetrov and partners"
more than just legal services
WhatsApp
Telegram