×
г.Новосибирск

Possibility of recovering the actual share in the authorized capital

07.06.2022

Possibility of recovering the actual share in the authorized capital in the presence of a negative value of the net assets of the LLC. Arbitrage practice.

In accordance with Art. 23 of the Federal Law "On LLC" the company is obliged to pay the participant who filed an application for withdrawal from the company the actual value of his share in the authorized capital.

However, the question arises: is the actual share paid to the participant upon exit from the company, if the net assets of the LLC are negative?

Case plot:

Yu.P. Surin, participant of Brus LLC. withdrew from the company in 2017, however, since he was not paid the actual value of the share in the authorized capital of the company, the person went to court with the relevant requirements and received a court decision in his favor.

Disagreeing with the decision, the participant Ltd. «Brus» Butorina AND.Yew. in the appeal noted that the negative value of the net assets of the company, confirmed by the calculation of the forensic examination, indicates that the company has no obligation to pay the plaintiff.

Judicial act: Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the East Siberian District of February 17, 2022 in case No. A78-7859 / 2018

Court's findings:

1. There are no grounds for refusing to pay the plaintiff the actual value of his share in the authorized capital, which was determined on the basis of the conclusions of forensic examinations and the artificial underestimation of the company's assets in the context of a corporate conflict.

2. It was established that the actions of LLC officials related to the adjustment of financial statements after the claimant left the LLC participants in the context of a corporate conflict are aimed at artificially lowering the company's assets in order to deprive the claimant of the opportunity to obtain the actual value of his share in the authorized capital.

3. The court accepted the calculation of the actual value of the share based on the financial statements of the LLC without taking into account its further adjustments.

Comment:

1. Based on paragraph 2 of Art. 14 of the Law on LLC, the actual value of the share of the participant must correspond to the part of the value of the net assets of the company, proportional to the size of its share. At the same time, the value of the company's net assets is determined as the difference between the company's assets and liabilities, data on which are taken from the balance sheet.

2. The issue under consideration has long been under consideration by the Presidium of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation, which stated that if the size of the net assets of the company is negative, the payment of the actual value of the share is impossible. This is true, because if the net asset value of the LLC is negative, it is impossible to talk about the existence of a difference due to which the actual value of the share would be paid.

3. In the present case, however, the court stated otherwise: the actual value of the share with negative assets can still be paid, however, on the condition that it is proved that the company's assets were artificially underestimated.

Please note that in 2020 the law firm Vetrov & Partners was marked by the industry rating of law firms Pravo.ru-300 in the nominations Arbitration Proceedings, Dispute Resolution in Courts of General Jurisdiction and is one of the regional companies throughout Russia in these nominations.

In the event that your litigation or other dispute, contractual work or any other form of activity concerns the issues discussed in this or our other material, we recommend that you check and make sure that your legal position complies with the latest changes in practice and legislation.

We will be happy to provide you with legal assistance regarding the minimization of legal risks and available opportunities. We will try to find a solution that is right for you.

Call +7 (383) 310-38-76 or write to info@vitvet.com.

Our law firm provides various legal services in different cities of Russia (including Novosibirsk, Tomsk, Omsk, Barnaul, Krasnoyarsk, Kemerovo, Novokuznetsk, Irkutsk, Chita, Vladivostok, Moscow, St. Petersburg, Yekaterinburg, Nizhny Novgorod, Kazan, Samara, Chelyabinsk, Rostov-on-Don, Ufa, Volgograd, Perm, Voronezh, Saratov, Krasnodar, Tolyatti, Sochi).

Marina Sorokina